Transformation of Collective Intelligences – Perspective of Transhumanism

<p>Introduction&nbsp; ix</p>
<p>Chapter 1. Elements of the General Configuration and Adaptive Landscape of Collective Intelligences&nbsp; 1</p>
<p>1.1. The intertwined narratives of tangible utopias and brilliant futures&nbsp; 1</p>
<p>1.2. Intelligence is always already collective and machined &nbsp; 5</p>
<p>1.3. Collective intelligences in the weaving of data&nbsp; 9</p>
<p>1.4. Semiotics and statistics&nbsp; 13</p>
<p>1.5. Data cities and human becomings: the new milieus of intelligence 17</p>
<p>1.5.1. Open Data (OD): a heterogeneous movement, the contribution to novel forms of knowledge in question&nbsp; 22</p>
<p>1.6. Coupling OD/big data/data mining 32</p>
<p>1.7. The semantic web as intellectual technology 34</p>
<p>1.8. Toward understanding onto–ethologies&nbsp; 42</p>
<p>1.9. Marketing intelligences: data and graphs in the heat of passions 50</p>
<p>1.10. Personal data: private property as an open and unstable process&nbsp; 59</p>
<p>1.11. The figures of the network 64</p>
<p>1.12. Machinic interfaces: social subjection and enslavement&nbsp; 67</p>
<p>1.13. Collective intelligences and anthropological concerns 70</p>
<p>1.14. Toward a new encyclopedic state: first overview&nbsp; 74</p>
<p>1.15. Controversies and boundaries 78</p>
<p>1.16. The milieus of intelligence and knowledge 84</p>
<p>1.17. Which criteria for writings?&nbsp; 86</p>
<p>1.18. Collective intelligences of usage and doxic collective intelligences: the status of short forms 90</p>
<p>1.19. Collective intelligences, self–organization, swarm intelligences 92</p>
<p>1.20. Short forms, relinkage, relaunching&nbsp; 99</p>
<p>1.21. Insomniac commentary as a catastrophic correction of short forms&nbsp; 100</p>
<p>1.22. Twitter as a Markovian Territory: a few remarks&nbsp; 103</p>
<p>Chapter 2. Post– and Transhumanist Horizons&nbsp; 107</p>
<p>2.1. Some bioanthropotechnical transformations 107</p>
<p>2.2. What to do with our brain?&nbsp; 113</p>
<p>2.3. About transhumanism and speculative posthumanism 122</p>
<p>2.4. Epigenetic and epiphylogenetic plasticity 125</p>
<p>2.5. Speculative uncertainties 127</p>
<p>2.6. Trans– and posthumanism as they present themselves&nbsp; 152</p>
<p>Chapter 3. Fragmented Encyclopedism 169</p>
<p>3.1. Collective intelligences and the encyclopedic problem 169</p>
<p>3.2. The political utopia in store 170</p>
<p>3.3. Encyclopedism and digital publishing modes 174</p>
<p>3.4. A new documentary process 176</p>
<p>3.5. Fragmented encyclopedism: education/interfaces&nbsp; 190</p>
<p>3.6. Encyclopedism and correlations 192</p>
<p>3.6.1. Correlation is enough : the Anderson controversy, and the J. Gray paradigm and their limits&nbsp; 192</p>
<p>3.7. Perplication in knowledge 198</p>
<p>3.7.1. Doxic tension in fragmented encyclopedism and format accordingly 198</p>
<p>3.8. Networks of the digital environment&nbsp; 199</p>
<p>3.8.1. Variations of speed and slowness at the center of encyclopedic pragmatics 200</p>
<p>3.9. Knowledge and thought in fragmented encyclopedism 201</p>
<p>3.10. What criteriology for encyclopedic writings?&nbsp; 202</p>
<p>3.11. Borders in fragmented encyclopedism: autoimmune disorders and disagreement&nbsp; 205</p>
<p>3.12. Fragmented encyclopedism: a habitat for controversies?&nbsp; 207</p>
<p>3.13. Encyclopedism according to the semantic and sociosemantic web (ontologies and web): mapping(s) and semantic levels 209</p>
<p>3.14. From ontologies to onto–ethologies and assemblages 212</p>
<p>3.15. Fragmented encyclopedism in the digital age: metalanguage and combinatorial&nbsp; 214</p>
<p>3.15.1. Encyclopedism and doxic immanence field: the proliferation of short forms 216</p>
<p>3.16. From fragmented encyclopedism to gaseous encyclopedism&nbsp; 217</p>
<p>Bibliography&nbsp; 219</p>
<p>Index 233Conclusion</p>